Neuroscience in Fiction: The Princess Bride

The novel is a wonderful read, but something that I hadn't expected is that the plot would revolve so much around the topic of pain, both psychological and physical.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



"He had felt no pain, not once, none. He had closed his eyes and taken his brain away. That was the secret."

Our upcoming Illusions article for Scientific American: Mind concerns pain. What is a pain illusion, you may ask? Broadly speaking, there are two main categories: you feel pain when you shouldn't (for instance, in the absence of physical damage) or you don't experience pain when you should (despite substantial physical damage). This last week, by coincidence, I read The Princess Bride (I had seen the movie when it came out in 1987, but forgotten most of it). The novel is a wonderful read, but something that I hadn't expected is that the plot would revolve so much around the topic of pain, both psychological and physical. As in death, torture, mutilation, and the loss of true love. The treatment of pain was quite sophisticated, in addition, especially for a "classic tale of true love and high adventure". (I supposed we shouldn't be too shocked since the writer, William Goldman, also wrote Marathon Man, with the infamous dental drill torture scene that plumbs the depths of pain and dental despair). As an example, a main character describes pain as "the most underrated emotion", a concept both provocative and controversial in contemporary neuroscience. The influence of (in)attention on pain perception is another topic in which The Princess Bride antecedes current findings in cognitive science. Recent research shows that burn victims can ignore the pain of daily treatments by focusing their attention on a virtual reality game depicting a snowy wonderland. Westley (aka Farm Boy aka Dread Pirate Roberts) took away his brain from his burning hands (dipped in oil and set aflame by his torturers) by contemplating Princess Buttercup's wintry skin.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe