The Anniversary of Neil Armstrong’s Death: An Illusion Tribute

Two hours before the historic lunar landing, Neil Armstrong mentally composed the first words to be said on the Moon: “It’s one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind”.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Neil Armstrong

One year ago yesterday, the first man on the Moon died at age 82. Two hours before the historic lunar landing, Neil Armstrong mentally composed the first words to be said on the Moon: “It’s one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind”. That was not quite the same sentence that is written in every history book. Instead, the quote that we know is, “It’s one small step for man…”, missing the ‘a’. Armstrong and NASA initially blamed the missing syllable on static, but audio analyses later confirmed that the interval between “for” and “man” was too short for there ever having been an “a”. Armstrong was reportedly embarrassed for having flubbed the first words on the moon, which in the end, only endeared him to the world all the more. In tribute, we have restored Armstrong’s original intent by splicing an “a” between “for” and “man”. The result is perhaps grammatically more correct, but less poetic than the actual unintended quote.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



The change also destroys one of the best examples of the reverse speech illusion known as “backmasking” (in which people hear messages, often claimed to be satanic, when playing musical lyrics and speeches backwards). In reverse, “one small space for man” sounds like “man will space walk”. Poignant, and true. “One small step for a man”, however, ruins the illusion and sounds something like “man-a will space walk” when played backwards.

Armstrong was bewildered about the missing “a” even decades after the landing. He needn’t have worried. His message was clear, backwards and forwards, and in every sense.

Listen to these clips for yourself below:

We thank our colleague Jorge Otero-Millan for refashioning the original NASA audio file.

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe