The Tilted Road Illusion

The latest viral illusion has a known explanation

Daniel Picon

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The latest illusion to go viral in social media depicts two side-by-side stretches of a narrow road, receding in the distance. Both images depict the retreating road at an oblique angle, but the right road’s slant is a lot more pronounced than the slant on the left road.

These are two identical photos of a road in Mexico. Credit: Daniel Picon

Or is it?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In fact, both pictures are identical. As user djeclipz put it, upon sharing the soon-to-become global sensation on Reddit: “This is the same photo, side by side. They are not taken at different angles. Both sides are the same, pixel for pixel.”  

So why do they look so different?

The illusion, created in 2010 by the French artist Daniel Picon and entitled “Roads in Mexico,” is a powerful variant of an earlier perceptual phenomenon discovered in 2007 by vision scientists Frederick Kingdom, Ali Yoonessi, and Elena Gheorghiu (all of them then at McGill University).

The right tower appears to lean more than the left tower, even though they are two copies of the same image. Credit: Frederick Kingdom

Kingdom and his colleagues dubbed the effect the “Leaning Tower Illusion,” because they first noticed it in a pair of identical photos of the Leaning Tower of Pisa. But, as Kingdom, Yoonesi, and Gheorghiu noted in an excellent Scholarpedia article about their discovery, “the illusion works with any image of a receding object,” including tram lines, train tracks and roads in Mexico.  

The Leaning Tower Illusion won First Prize in the 2007 Best Illusion of the Year Contest, and is featured prominently in our recent book about the annual competition, Champions of Illusion. An excerpt of Champions of Illusion follows, concerning the bases of this effect:

Because the two Pisa towers pictured in the paired images do not converge as they recede, as they would if standing side by side in front of our eyes, the brain mistakenly perceives them as diverging. In contrast, when we look at a single photograph showing two actual parallel towers, such as the Petronas Twin Towers in Kuala Lumpur, we see the buildings converge in the distance as they recede, and therefore we perceive them as parallel.

The creator of “Roads in Mexico” kindly provided an additional example of the illusion for this blog post. Credit: Daniel Picon

These two identical sets of train tracks appear to run at different angles. Credit: Tomwsulcer Wikimedia 

Further analysis of similar images indicates that the phenomenon applies to all sorts of receding objects, not only those that recede in height. It is hard to believe, but these are actually identical images of parallel train tracks. Although the angles of the train tracks are the same in both images, the brain perceives them as being quite different.

The illusion fails with two identical Manga girl cartoons. The reason is that—unlike the Pisa towers or the Mexican road—the cartoon characters are not receding objects. Credit: Akiyoshi Kitaoka

[…] The Leaning Tower Illusion does not occur when we view two leaning Japanese manga girls, even though the two cartoon images are tilted. The reason is that the cartoon girls do not appear to recede in depth, so our brain does not expect them to converge in the distance. This phenomenon demonstrates that the brain applies its depth-perception toolkit only in specific situations, depending on the object.

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe