Victorian Illusions

This week a new article on illusions from the Golden Age, written by Susana Martinez-Conde and me, came out: Scientific American Mind. The Victorian era was a watershed in brain science and the study of illusions and perception served as the cornerstone for the field of Psychology that grew from it. 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


This week a new article on illusions from the Golden Age, written by Susana Martinez-Conde and me, came out: Scientific American Mind.

The Victorian era was a watershed in brain science. The study of illusions and perception, in particular the work of the German scientist Gustav Fechner, served as the cornerstone for the field of Psychology that grew from it. So neuroscience and the study of illusory perception have always gone hand in hand. From this era we inherited a number of illusion based technologies, such as moving pictures—which led to TV, computers and smart phones.

It was with this knowledge that Hull & Train, a science museum exhibition production company, came to us to help them design Eyellusions: a new travelling exhibit of illusory science that was thematically set in the Victorian era. The science is cutting-edge and contemporary: we made sure of that! But the Victorian theme is historically relevant and brings a certain visual wonderfulness to the project, which I love.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Come see the show, which recently opened at the Sci-Tech Discovery Science Center in Frisco, Texas,

As part of the exhibit, the creative Canadian duo Hall Train and Alexandra Lemay produced a sci-fi epic video showcasing how magicians, such as Georges Méliès, developed movie effects like forced perspective and stop motion photography, by employing a basic understanding of simple visual illusions. What is really cool here is that they shot the entire film with a smart phone. Check it out!

 

Susana and I also filmed a number of scientific explanations for the exhibitions displays in full Victorian regalia. Here is one video (below) and you may enjoy to see them all here.

Stephen L. Macknik is a professor of opthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y. Along with Susana Martinez-Conde and Sandra Blakeslee, he is author of the Prisma Prize-winning Sleights of Mind. Their forthcoming book, Champions of Illusion, will be published by Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

More by Stephen L. Macknik

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe