When a Still Life Comes Alive

This artist’s paintings walk among us

Sport Club Paintings in Reality.

 Alexa Meade

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Alexa Meade’s life can look like something out of the 1980's A-ha video Take On Me. The header image of this blog post features the artist herself, as the woman following her portrait creations down the walkway. We showed the picture to our 12 year-old son, asking him, "Doesn't this look just like a painting?" and had to laugh when he replied, “Nah, it's obviously a filter.” So even in an era where digital natives have deeply engrained knowledge of Instagram's functions, these illusions confound and delight. More important to scientists, Meade’s artworks are relevant to understanding how we see depth.

The image is uncanny: normal in every way, except for the two people in stark black/white contrast, who seem to have arisen from flatland. Even though the models cast shadows, and must be actually shaded themselves by the sun and sky—just as Meade herself is—the paint job obscures and destroys such depth cues. As we also discuss in our Illusions column in the September issue of Scientific American MIND, Meade’s creations feed your visual system with erroneous information, leaving you with the perception of flat actors—though you know they must belong to a 3D universe.

Meade explains that she has searched for years for the right name for her illusions but has not found it yet. She hopes to enlist the help of Scientific American readers:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“There have been numerous attempts at coming up with a name for this illusion concept, but so far, I haven’t found any terms that really seem to capture the essence. If given the chance to name it yourself, what would you call it? How would you describe this illusion in the most elegantly simple terms?”

Please use the comments section to propose your best names for Meade’s creations!

A variety of Meade's projects are featured in the video and images below.

 Living Paintings Artist Reel. Credit: Alexa Meade

Sport Club Getting Set. Credit: Alexa Meade

Sunu Bashful Glance. Credit: Alexa Meade

Out to this World. Credit: Alexa Meade

Suited for Alexa to Paint the Face. Credit: Alexa Meade

Additional Reading:

Susana Martinez-Conde and Stephen Macknik (2019). Help, I’m Stuck in a Painting!Scientific American MIND 30(5): 44-45.

Stephen L. Macknik is a professor of opthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y. Along with Susana Martinez-Conde and Sandra Blakeslee, he is author of the Prisma Prize-winning Sleights of Mind. Their forthcoming book, Champions of Illusion, will be published by Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

More by Stephen L. Macknik

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe