When Hillary Met Donald

An election-themed illusion to take your mind off the polls

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


As tempted as I am to use the video below as an excuse to discuss this Tuesday’s presidential election, I’m going to try my hardest to stay focused on perception instead.

This illusion, entitled “When Hillary met Donald,” is a recent creation of Best Illusion of the Year Contest veterans Michael Pickard and Gurpreet Singh, from Sunderland University in the UK.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Pickard and Singh’s “micro-macro” pictures are composite portraits of the two candidates, in which each “pixel” of the bigger pictures is a miniature version of their opponent’s photo. In a very real sense, human vision is always pixelated, though, in that photons arrive first to our retinal photoreceptors: a mosaic of discrete neural units, each in possession of the tiniest window to the visual world. These minute windows, called receptive fields, are the trees making up the forest of your perception.

Just make sure that, come Tuesday, you don’t miss the forest for the trees.

Susana Martinez-Conde is a professor of ophthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, N.Y. She is author of the Prisma Prize–winning Sleights of Mind, along with Stephen Macknik and Sandra Blakeslee, and of Champions of Illusion, along with Stephen Macknik.

More by Susana Martinez-Conde

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe