Wide Faces Make You Selfish

An intriguing new paper in PLoS ONE by Haselhuhn and colleagues suggests that men with wide faces make you selfish.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


http://i618.photobucket.com/albums/tt266/brendanjansen81/grimace3.gif

An intriguing new paper in PLoS ONE by Haselhuhn and colleagues suggests that men with wide faces make you selfish. No… really. The explanation is simple: {taking a deep breath now} since men with wide faces are more aggressive, less-trustworthy, and more prone to engage in deception (that last one is my favorite!) it is indubitably beneficial for you to assume that any wide-faced dude is dubitable, and for you to preempt said presumed onset of selfish behavior with—you guessed it—selfish behavior. Fight fire with fire.

One possible explanation, the authors propose, is that this vicious circle—this sardine that bites its own tail—is a self-fulfilling prophecy. That is, because you assume that the fat guy is selfish (you might wonder: perhaps this chow-champ wants a bigger piece of the pie?), it follows logically that you must protect your interests, which then does not go unnoticed by your wide-bodied companion, prompting selfish behavior.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The authors start off by testing the premise: wide-faced guys are indeed prone to selfish behavior, tested with a battery of economic games. Check: proself behavior confirmed. And not just competitive behavior, they maximized their irrespective of their opponent’s resources. Then they asked random people to play the same games against an opponent represented by a photo of a face characterized by its width-to-height ratio. They found that people only acted selfish when they were playing against a wide-faced male.

But what does it mean now that I recently changed from morbidly obese (wide-faced) to healthy-weight (less-wide-faced). Am I less selfish now, or are you?

Stephen L. Macknik is a professor of opthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y. Along with Susana Martinez-Conde and Sandra Blakeslee, he is author of the Prisma Prize-winning Sleights of Mind. Their forthcoming book, Champions of Illusion, will be published by Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

More by Stephen L. Macknik

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe