Wide Faces Make You Selfish

An intriguing new paper in PLoS ONE by Haselhuhn and colleagues suggests that men with wide faces make you selfish.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


http://i618.photobucket.com/albums/tt266/brendanjansen81/grimace3.gif

An intriguing new paper in PLoS ONE by Haselhuhn and colleagues suggests that men with wide faces make you selfish. No… really. The explanation is simple: {taking a deep breath now} since men with wide faces are more aggressive, less-trustworthy, and more prone to engage in deception (that last one is my favorite!) it is indubitably beneficial for you to assume that any wide-faced dude is dubitable, and for you to preempt said presumed onset of selfish behavior with—you guessed it—selfish behavior. Fight fire with fire.

One possible explanation, the authors propose, is that this vicious circle—this sardine that bites its own tail—is a self-fulfilling prophecy. That is, because you assume that the fat guy is selfish (you might wonder: perhaps this chow-champ wants a bigger piece of the pie?), it follows logically that you must protect your interests, which then does not go unnoticed by your wide-bodied companion, prompting selfish behavior.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The authors start off by testing the premise: wide-faced guys are indeed prone to selfish behavior, tested with a battery of economic games. Check: proself behavior confirmed. And not just competitive behavior, they maximized their irrespective of their opponent’s resources. Then they asked random people to play the same games against an opponent represented by a photo of a face characterized by its width-to-height ratio. They found that people only acted selfish when they were playing against a wide-faced male.

But what does it mean now that I recently changed from morbidly obese (wide-faced) to healthy-weight (less-wide-faced). Am I less selfish now, or are you?

Stephen L. Macknik is a professor of opthalmology, neurology, and physiology and pharmacology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y. Along with Susana Martinez-Conde and Sandra Blakeslee, he is author of the Prisma Prize-winning Sleights of Mind. Their forthcoming book, Champions of Illusion, will be published by Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

More by Stephen L. Macknik

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe