Clio, muse of history

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Image of the Week #55, August 14th, 2012:

From:Humanities aren t a science. Stop treating them like one. by Maria Konnikova at Literally Psyched.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Source: Artemisia Gentileschi, 1632, public domain, Wikimedia Commons.

One of the greatest painters of the Baroque in Rome, Artemisia Gentileschi’s artwork stands out for its portrayal of strong women in a male-dominated world. In Maria Konnikova’s post on Literally Psyched, Humanities aren t a science. Stop treating them like one.. Konnikova illustrates the concept of Cliodynamics – the use of scientific methodology to illuminate historical events – with Gentileschi’s portrait of mythical Clio, muse of history (1632).

Unlike most depictions of the mythical muses, Gentileschi, herself a rare woman-artist accepted into the 17th century Florentine Academy of the Arts of Drawing, Clio painted here is scholarly, commanding, and has her hand on a text (containing the artist’s name) while gazing upward into the sky at the future.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe