The Great Architeuthis

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Image of the Week #60, September 18th, 2012:

From:SciArt of the Day: The Great Architeuthis by Kalliopi Monoyios at Symbiartic.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Source: Louis Figuier, The Ocean World: Being a description of the sea and some of its inhabitants, 1872.

A dramatic encounter with a giant mollusc off the coast of Teneriffe is captured in woodcut in the 1872 work The Ocean World: Being a description of the sea and some of its inhabitants, by naturalist Louis Figuier.

As access to primary materials from remote expeditions was limiting in that era, original illustrations were copied and recopied in many subsequent works. Figuier’s figure was apparently redrawn from an earlier account by an M. Berthelot, and later depictions appear in multiple ocean-themed books. While downstream copies typically grow ever more spectacular in the retelling, at least one instance- Henry Lee’s 1884 “Sea Monsters Unmasked”- bears an amusingly candid disclaimer: “In the accompanying illustration, the size of the squid is exaggerated, but not so much as has been supposed.” (Source)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe