Introducing: Douglas Main

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


This is a series of Q&As with young and up-and-coming science, health and environmental writers and reporters. They - at least some of them - have recently hatched in the Incubators (science writing programs at schools of journalism), have even more recently fledged (graduated), and are now making their mark as wonderful new voices explaining science to the public.

Today we introduce you to Doug Main (Green blog, Twitter)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Hello, welcome to The SA Incubator. Let’s start from the beginning: where are you originally from?

I'm from Champaign, Illinois--home to the University of Illinois. A great Midwest college town; an ideal place to grow up.

How did you get into science and how did you get into writing? And how did these two trajectories fuse into becoming a science writer?

Man, I've always loved the natural world, living things, and science of all kinds. Writing has also been a lifelong passion, and reading. In first grade I wrote a short story called "Trapped in Paradise" about insurance dealer brothers Ken and Scott who crash land on a tropical island. I spent much of my youth outside and was an Eagle Scout. I spent several years on my high school's awesome newspaper (The Gargoyle). At Washington University in St. Louis, I was a reporter and news editor for the newspaper, Student Life. I also double-majored in environmental biology and English literature.

Every science writer I've talked to seems to have had an "aha" moment. Here's mine: during sophomore year I was working in the lab of an ethnobotanist named Walter Lewis and his wife Memory Elvin-Lewis. I told Memory that I liked science but didn't really like doing research that much. Instead of being alarmed or annoyed, since I was being paid to, you know, do research, she mentioned that she'd been interviewed by a science writer named Tony Fitzpatrick, who wrote a story about a study of hers. So I met with Tony, and he became a mentor and lifelong friend (and made me realize you could write about science for a living). Tony helped me get my first paid writing gigs with Wash U's alumni paper and the Howard Hughes Medical Institutes’ The Bulletin.

After graduating I took a job as a science writer at Purdue University, for 2.5 years. Then I took a brief break from writing and worked as a researcher at a biofuels company. But I knew that was a detour, and soon got back into writing, specifically journalism. I wanted to write for readers, as opposed to please the people I was writing about (as was the case as a public information officer).

Why did you decide to attend a specialized science/health/environmental writing program instead of a generalized journalism or writing program, or just starting a blog and hoping to break into the science writing business?

I went to the Science, Health & Environmental Reporting Program at NYU because I thought that'd be the best way to go from being a "science writer" to a "science journalist," and was easier than trying to break into the biz without many contacts.

Which science writing program did you attend? Why did you choose that one? What are your best experiences there?

SHERP at NYU. I knew I wanted to move to NYC and it came down to Columbia and NYU. Although I’m not exclusively interested in science (for example I love sports--especially the St. Louis Cardinals--and follow politics with perverse fascination), it matters greatly to me, and given my background I thought it made more sense to go to SHERP than to a place that had maybe one class in science writing. Plus my advisor Dan Fagin was very encouraging (and will be a lifelong friend/mentor). I definitely made the right choice.

The best part is all the amazing people I’ve met, especially my classmates and teachers.

What professional experience you have had so far – publications, internships, jobs? Feel free to include a bunch of links here! What is your current job?

My first internship was at Popular Mechanics. My favorite pieces were about making antivenom, underwater volcanoes and vampire bats. I was also the web intern at Discover Magazine (see my stuff here and here). Now I freelance for the New York Times Green Blog, Popular Mechanics, OurAmazingPlanet.com and elsewhere. My favorite piece for the Green Blog is the story of a grad student who was a Peace Corps volunteer, only to see her West African village devoured by locusts. She then devoted her life to studying the voracious insects. My second favorite story seeks to answer the following question, which I’m sure keeps you up at night: can the cowman and the panther coexist?

Do you write a personal or science blog (URLs)? How much do you use social media networks, e.g., Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus, Tumblr, Pinterest, Flickr, YouTube etc., to promote your own and your friends’ work, to learn and to connect?

I use Twitter a lot @Douglas_Main. I don’t really have a blog, which is silly. I plan to start one any day, though. Can I update this when I do? I’ve been planning on doing it for the last two years.

Apart from writing, do you also do other aspects of science communication, e.g., podcasts, video, art/illustration, photography, infographics, or do you do any coding, web design and programming?

I did a couple videos in SHERP, which were fun to make with my excellent partners Rose Eveleth and Rachel Nuwer. I took a class in coding and infographics that taught me a lot. But my main focus is on being the best writer I can possibly be. If, however, any future employers are reading this, I’m really good at all of these things.

How do you see the current and future science media ecosystem, how it differs from the past, and what role will new, young science communicators like yourself play in building it and making it the best it can be?

It’s certainly concerning that there’s been such a decline in staff jobs at newspapers and other traditional outlets for science journalists. But I’m an optimist, and certainly excited & encouraged by science writing on the web now.

I hope the role of new science writers/communicators like myself will be to bravely, earnestly and skeptically tackle the important and fascinating issues of the day, as opposed to the “mainstream” stories that one feels “have to be written about,” or done as a matter of course. Do it well and be original, or don’t bother.

Thank you!

No sir—thank you.

====================

Previously in this series:

Kristina Ashley Bjoran

Emily Eggleston

Erin Podolak

Rachel Nuwer

Hannah Krakauer

Rose Eveleth

Nadia Drake

Kelly Izlar

Jack Scanlan

Francie Diep

Maggie Pingolt

Jessica Gross

Abby McBride

Natalie Wolchover

Jordan Gaines

Audrey Quinn

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe