Khalil’s Picks (15 November 2013)

Another really awesome week with everything from some some meta-science journalism stories to the wonders of rocks ants, crocodiles, dead satellites and Carl Sagan.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Another really awesome week with everything from some some meta-science journalism stories to the wonders of rocks ants, crocodiles, dead satellites and Carl Sagan.

Yep.

--


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Remixing Science by Paige Brown

In his book Remix, Lawrence Lessig documents two different cultures in today’s media landscape: A Read-Only (RO) culture that has historically been the business model of the publishing, broadcast, film and music industries, and a Read/Write (RW) culture that has been empowered by digital technologies. A read only culture consumes, providing big profits for large broadcast and publishing industries – think Hollywood, iTunes music and other strictly copyrighted art.

Of skiing and seeing: Remembering Tom Troscianko by Pete Etchells

Some people have a unique ability to find adventure in everything, even the ordinary. Professor Tom Troscianko was one of those people, and it was a quality that left a lasting impression on students and colleagues alike.

How is Past Experience Biasing Our Decision-Making? Insights from Rock Ants by Felicity Muth

Think about all the decisions you’ve made today. Even if you’re reading this in the morning, you’ve probably already made hundreds or even thousands of decisions, without even thinking consciously about most of them. We like to think of ourselves as being in control of our own decisions, and making rational, well-informed choices. However, more and more research is showing that this just isn’t the case, as has been popularised in books like Predictably Irrational and Thinking fast and slow.

Are crocodiles secret fruit-lovers? by Jon Tennant

Seed dispersal by animals is important for plants to help them occupy new areas of land. Usually bugs, birds, or intrepid kittens do that job. Now we can add crocodiles to that list. A new study reviewed the diets of crocodiles and showed that 13 of 18 species ate fruit of some sort and a wide variety of plants.

Some Dead Satellites Refuse to Go Quietly to Their Graves by Kyle Hill

High above us, tens of thousands of kilometers above our heads, there are orbiting graveyards. They are filled with satellites that have burned through their functional lives, now “buried” in space. The graveyards are filled for a reason: A dead satellite is a dangerous one.

Why We Should Keep Talking About Carl Sagan by Travis Park

This may be a blog about palaeontology but in this particular post I want to talk about science communication. More specifically, I want to reply to a blog article posted on Wednesday by Erin Podolak (@ErinPodolak) entitled "Can we stop talking about Carl Sagan?". I am not attempting to disagree completely with everything in Erin's post, as I hope to articulate below, but I believe strongly that there is no valid reason to stop talking about Sagan, rather, we should be talking about and celebrating his efforts to communicate science to the general public.

Don't stop there, here's more:

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe