How to classify science news stories?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


This summer, I taught an introductory geology summer school class, heading back to my academic roots. Throughout the six week class, I asked my students to find a news story or blog post each week related to some aspect of geology from credible sources. My goal was to get them looking at popular science available on the web.

Because I was hoping for some variety in their submissions, I asked them to find two stories from three categories of geology-related news - one story a week for six weeks.

  1. News stories or blog posts related to recent geologic events: earthquakes, landslides, tsunamis etc.

  2. Reports about recent research that had been published in the peer reviewed literature or via government reports

  3. Discussion of policy issues related to geologic concepts: hydro-fracking, water desalination, climate change, etc.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The students found some really interesting stuff, but they sometimes had problems telling apart the categories I created. The most confusing stories were reports about recent research related to past geologic events, like a recent report outlining new scientific research about the risk of volcanic eruptions near Sumatra.

Understanding the nature of the science news stories is an important first step in understanding the topics discussed and putting these stories in context. A news story that references climate change in relation to recent heat waves is different than a science news story reporting on recent research findings related to global temperatures.

While my original three categories were focused on geology, I think there may be equivalent stories across the sciences.

But these categories might not be sufficient. What other science news categories might be useful? Biographical items? General interest field reports? Add your suggestions in the comments.

About Bonnie Swoger

Bonnie J. M. Swoger is a Science and Technology Librarian at a small public undergraduate institution in upstate New York, SUNY Geneseo. She teaches students about the science literature, helps faculty and students with library research questions and leads library assessment efforts. She has a BS in Geology from St. Lawrence University, an MS in Geology from Kent State University and an MLS from the University at Buffalo. She would love to have some free time in which to indulge in hobbies. She blogs at the Undergraduate Science Librarian and can be found on twitter @bonnieswoger.

More by Bonnie Swoger

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe