Preserving scholarly information: LOCKSS, CLOCKKS, and portico

While the switch from print to digital publishing has been embraced by younger researchers and students, older faculty are a little more nervous about the impact of this (nearly complete) transition.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


While the switch from print to digital publishing has been embraced by younger researchers and students, older faculty are a little more nervous about the impact of this (nearly complete) transition. This is somewhat related to the loss of print copies to hold in their hands and read, but for many, there is a larger issue. These faculty understand that when many libraries keep a physical copy of a book, the preservation of these materials was more likely due to the existence of multiple copies: If my library is destroyed by a tornado or a flood, other libraries would most likely have access to the same scholarly journals.

With digital information, it is less clear to the user how this information will be preserved and archived for future generations. After all, many of us have unreadable media floating around our offices or houses:

  • A faculty colleague has hundreds of research images on a CD-ROM his computer can’t read

  • My masters thesis was carefully preserved on a zip-disk.

  • A few faculty even confess to hanging onto the punch cards they created during the research for their dissertation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If digital information is not properly curated and preserved, it can become impossible to access over time. Digital information is also more subject to changes in the publishing business. If a publish goes bankrupt, what will happen to their publications?

There are currently several initiatives to help preserve digital content, and to help preserve access to content. These initiatives require cooperation between libraries and publishers to ensure that content is safely archived and accessible:

  • LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe), based at Stanford University

  • CLOCKSS (Controlled Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe), An independent non-profit organization

  • portico, From Ithaka, the same folks who bring you JSTOR

How does LOCKSS work? | Create Infographics

Preserving digital material requires consistent effort (read: money and people), cooperation between many types of institutions, and a commitment to maintaining access to scholarly material.

About Bonnie Swoger

Bonnie J. M. Swoger is a Science and Technology Librarian at a small public undergraduate institution in upstate New York, SUNY Geneseo. She teaches students about the science literature, helps faculty and students with library research questions and leads library assessment efforts. She has a BS in Geology from St. Lawrence University, an MS in Geology from Kent State University and an MLS from the University at Buffalo. She would love to have some free time in which to indulge in hobbies. She blogs at the Undergraduate Science Librarian and can be found on twitter @bonnieswoger.

More by Bonnie Swoger

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe