October 5, 2014

Lab Rat Lecture

Last month I had the privilege of being invited as a speaker for the Blogging Microbes event at the University of Nottingham. Hosted by Ivan Lafayette it was a great discussion of the role of blogs, twitter, and podcasts in communicating science, particularly microbiology, to a wider audience.

By S.E. Gould

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

The full event is below, starting with a presentation from Alan Cann from MicrobiologyBytes (one of my favourite microbe blogs – so it was great to hear from him!) My presentation is next (starting at 09:45), then Faraz Alam from Memoirs of a Defective Brain, James Gurney from the League of Nerds and finally Oscar Rozalez from the bilingual blog Stupidity is Tremendously more Interesting. It was a great group of people talking about experiences of different social media in different blogging environments – from the more academic writing focusing on papers and twitter conversations, to more social writing including some information on avoiding being sued.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

One of the most interesting discussions we had was on the purpose of twitter: should it be for conversations and discussions, or for broadcasting work and sharing links? Like many aspects of blogging, I believe it depends on what you want to do with your blog, and what kind of audience you want to reach. Audience is a vital part of writing, even writing as personal as a blog.

Disclaimer: In my presentation I speak a little about women in science blogging, however this is a complex issue and I am not a sociologist. My presentation just gives a few thoughts I had on the issue, and is not intended to be a comprehensive study.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American