Shooting the messenger: small RNA as a target for antibiotics

All living cells contain DNA; the code for producing every protein needed by the cell. As DNA is important it needs to be kept safe. Plants and animals keep their DNA tightly twisted and organised inside a double-membrane bound nucleus while bacteria keep their DNA coiled up in a big circle, with the occasional loop [...]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


All living cells contain DNA; the code for producing every protein needed by the cell. As DNA is important it needs to be kept safe. Plants and animals keep their DNA tightly twisted and organised inside a double-membrane bound nucleus while bacteria keep their DNA coiled up in a big circle, with the occasional loop floating around separately. With smaller cells, bacteria don’t have the space for large membrane-bound organelles, and they can also tolerate a bit of genetic damage slightly more than large multicellular structures.

To act as an intermediate between DNA and proteins cells also contain RNA – which is a more flexible and shorter lived molecule in the same family as DNA. If the DNA is a library with all cellular information neatly filed then RNA is a messy folder full of notes that can be scattered around the cell to wherever they are most needed. RNA has lots of jobs; it is a vital part of protein production and can also be used to regulate and control cellular processes.

Although bacterial DNA is not locked up in a nucleus, it is still useful for bacteria to be able to make and distribute copies of it. Small pieces of RNA, imaginatively called small-RNA (sRNA) can be used to control the production of proteins and other pieces of RNA. These little lines of code require little energy to produce and can regulate their targets in a coordinated manner, and because of this they are often used to help the bacteria respond quickly to changing circumstances.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Recent studies have shown that when bacteria are exposed to antibiotics they produce more sRNA. Many of the cellular processes targeted by antibiotics (including damage to the cell wall and protein production) are normally controlled by sRNA so the sudden flurry of production may be the bacteria attempting to minimise damage or activate antibiotic resistance pathways. sRNA is also important for active antibacterial resistance such as the production of protein pumps that forcibly remove the antibiotic from the cell.

More interestingly, it was found that blocking the production of sRNA leaves the cell more vulnerable to antibiotic attack. While preventing sRNA production may not be a viable antibiotic therapy by itself the targeted blocking of specific small RNA pieces could be used as an adjuvant – a therapy added along with the antibiotic to make it more powerful. As antibiotic resistance starts to spread, the need for therapies to increase the power of the antibiotics currently in circulation will always be useful, and sRNA is a fascinating little molecule to study.

Reference: Lalaouna D, Eyraud A, Chabelskaya S, Felden B, Mass? E (2014) Regulatory RNAs Involved in Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance. PLoS Pathog 10(8): e1004299. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004299

About S.E. Gould

A biochemist with a love of microbiology, the Lab Rat enjoys exploring, reading about and writing about bacteria. Having finally managed to tear herself away from university, she now works for a small company in Cambridge where she turns data into manageable words and awesome graphs.

More by S.E. Gould

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe