A Meal Fit for a King

A bitten bone shows how a young tyrannosaur fed

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Paleontologists sometimes call hadrosaurs “the cows of the Cretaceous.” These shovel-beaked herbivores were common, numerous, and, if we’re honest, at least partly famous as fodder for the carnivorous giants of their time. Whether they tasted anything like beef is a question beyond our current abilities to discern, but it seems they were delictable enough to the tyrannosaurs who were the top predators of the same times and places. A bitten bone from the Treasure State indicates that even little tyrants had a taste for duckbills.

The fossil, described by paleontologists Joseph Peterson and Karsen Daus, belongs to a partial hadrosaur skeleton found in the Hell Creek Formation of Carter County, Wyoming. It’s a caudal vertebra, or part of the tail, and what makes it stand out is a pair of oval punctures driven into the bone. These weren’t made by a misguided pickaxe or preparator’s tool. These are bite marks. The question is who was doing the biting.

Late Cretaceous Montana was home to an array of carnivores. There were raptors of varying size, crocodiles, and, of course, Tyrannosaurus rex. The shape of the punctures rule out the first two groups. The teeth of dromaeosaurids are too small and don’t match the shape, and a crocodile bite would have left a different pattern. This makes T. rex the top contender, Peterson and Daus write, but this Cretaceous crime scene wasn’t created by an adult. This was the work of a teenager.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


T. rex is one of the best-sampled dinosaurs we know of, including fossils representing life stages from juvenile to adult. The skeleton of “Jane,” in particular, is about as good a look as we’re going to get at an adolescent T. rex. (Some might contend that “Nanotyrannus,” a pint-sized tyrannosaur, might be a suspect, but there is no definitive evidence that this dinosaur existed. The specimens proposed as “Nanotyrannus” are exactly what we would expect of young T. rex, and that remains the state of the science.) And, as luck would have it, the teeth of “Jane” are a close match the bite marks on the hadrosaur vertebra. The youngster chomped hard enough to leave its mark in bone.

This adds a new wrinkle to the T. rex saga. The “tyrant king” really did rule its environment - it was the only large carnivorous dinosaur in the Hell Creek and equivalent formations. Part of this might be because T. rex changed so dramatically with age, meaning that juvenile and subadult T. rex might have taken up the ecological space normally occupied by other species of carnivorous dinosaur, perhaps munching on different prey as they grew up. But the correspondence between the bite marks and the jaws of “Jane” indicate that by around 11 years old, at the latest, young T. rex were already starting to get the most from carcasses. They didn’t yet have the bone-crushing bites of adults, but they weren’t necessarily shy about biting deep and scraping bone. This was practice for breaking down bodies even further, pulverizing prey in a way few other dinosaurs were capable of.  

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe