Dinosaurs, in Living Color

Analysis of a fossil bird reveals an unexpected facet of dinosaur life.

Stellar's Jay

Could fossilized clues in ancient eyes tell us whether prehistoric dinosaurs were as colorful as their modern counterparts?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The fossil record is always surrounded by caveats. Consider, for example, a beautifully-preserved dinosaur skeleton – your pick for species – curled up in a bed of sandstone. As stunning as such an osteological remnant might be, there’s plenty we can’t know. We can say that the dinosaur was buried in this spot, surely, but where the dinosaur lived and even died is an open question. What color that dinosaur was and what it sounded like are also beyond our reach if we only have bones to work with. And yet it would be a mistake to say that we’ll never know these things, at least in some cases. We’re only just starting to realize how detailed the fossil record is, as the eye of a prehistoric bird reminds us.

Up until now, we really had no idea of how prehistoric dinosaurs saw the world around them. There’s been a little research on using the details of sclerotic rings – bones inside the eye of reptiles like dinosaurs – to determine whether some species were active during the day or night, but paleontologists disagree on the interpretation, not to mention that the debate didn’t have much to add about color. But in an analysis of a 120 million-year-old-bird from China, Gengo Tanaka and colleagues propose that they’ve detected the rods and cones that might testify to Cretaceous color vision.

The delicately-preserved fossil, given the label SNHM 6105 and identified as an enantiornithine bird, looks more or less like many of the other exceptional skeletons that have been found in the vicinity of Liaoning, China. Most of the bird’s bones are in articulation, and there’s a smattering of preserved feathers around the body. But the standout feature of this fossil can only been seen with powerful microscopes. It seems that part of the bird’s retina became preserved along with the skeleton, retaining the distribution of oil droplets, rods, and cords – tiny structures related to vision at different light levels.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So what could this Cretaceous bird see? By comparing the details of the fossil bird’s eye to those of modern birds, like the common house sparrow, the researchers conclude that the 120 million-year-old avian likely had color vision. This isn’t a huge surprise as previous analyses of fossil feathers have shown that dinosaurs – both avian and non-avian – often bore flashy color patterns. Such hues would be pointless if they couldn't be seen. Color vision and plumage patterns dovetailed. But this is just the start. Now that paleontologists know such features can be preserved, they can begin to look for other examples and start asking further questions. The fossil record isn’t all about bones and footprints. There’s more held in the stone than anyone ever expected. We’ll see what comes next.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe