Andromeda mon amour

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Andromeda (GALEX/NASA/JPL)

There is something beautiful yet ominous about our nearest large galactic neighbor.

The Andromeda galaxy is a trillion star behemoth that spans some six times the diameter of the full Moon when seen through a telescope. At only 2.5 million light years away from the Milky Way it's barely an intergalactic stone's throw from us, and the gravitational might of our two galaxies is pulling them together against the stretching expansion of the cosmos. Every year we get closer by about 2 billion miles. And, as I've written about before, in some 4 billion years or so we'll begin a process of merger, a grand slow-motion galactic collision.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The outcome of this will most likely be a new system, our merged components perhaps dissolving into a giant elliptical galaxy, with stellar orbits thrown into a vast puff. No more Milky Way, no more Andromeda, just distant memories.

These observations were made by Herschel's spectral and photometric imaging receiver (SPIRE) instrument. The data were processed as part of a project to improve methods for assembling mosaics from SPIRE observations. Light with a wavelength of 250 microns is rendered as blue, 350-micron is green, and 500-micron light is red. Color saturation has been enhanced to bring out the small differences at these wavelengths. (ESA/NASA)

But until then we get to observe this beautiful spiral object. Andromeda seems to be producing stars at a slightly slower rate than the Milky Way, but this doesn't mean it's devoid of stellar birth. New images from the ESA/NASA space observatory Herschel allow us to map out the cooler interstellar dust and dense regions of star and planet formation by sensing far infrared and submillimeter wavelength radiation from this matter. At these wavebands photons are less attenuated by gas and dust and less confused with starlight, allowing astronomers to peer deep into Andromeda's nurseries.

Andromeda - to the left in far infrared, to the right in visible light (ESA/Herschel/PACS & SPIRE Consortium, O. Krause, HSC, H. Linz)

They're extraordinary images, and here I show a comparison with the visible light image of Andromeda. Stars are being born in rings, spokes, and spiral arm structures throughout our neighbor. Chances are that we look a lot like this for any hypothetical Andromedan astronomer peering back at us across the void.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe