Fun with Gravitational Waves

Even the Earth–sun system radiates gravitational waves, but just how powerful are they?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Someone asked me recently why it's only black holes and compact objects like neutron stars that produce gravitational waves.

The answer is that it isn't only these objects.

The gravitational wave signals detected by LIGO do come from the inspiral of pairs of black holes. But, in simple terms, all moving, accelerating, asymmetrical objects can generate ripples in space that will carry energy away. The extreme compactness of black holes is what allows them to generate enough wave energy to not only be (just) detectable by our instruments, but to also inspiral on cosmically short timescales as that energy is lost to the cosmos.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Binary stars emit gravitational waves, stars and planets do, and even a pair of waltzing humans are radiating into the 'fabric' of space - albeit with a power level that is absolutely miniscule. 

Specifically, the power being lost into gravitational waves by a pair of objects of masses m1 and m2, orbiting around their common center of mass in circular paths is given by:

 

 

If we plug in values for the Earth-Sun system (with its orbital separation r) the power being radiated away in gravitational waves is about 200 Joules per second (200 watts).

That might actually sound like quite a lot, until you compare it to the total kinetic and potential energy of the Earth in the Sun's gravitational field, which is roughly 1036 joules. So, over the course of a single orbit the total energy loss due to gravitational waves would be roughly equivalent to a shift in Earth's orbital radius of 10-13 centimeters.

Another way to look at this is to ask how long it would take for two orbiting objects to inspiral due to gravitational wave energy loss. The basic formula for this timescale (in handy units of orbital radius 'a' in AU and masses in solar masses) is:

 

 

If the Earth and Sun had no external influences, and if the Sun remained the way it is today (rather than inflating in a few billion years and essentially wiping out the inner planets of the solar system), and if we ignore other tidal force effects, the pair would take roughly 1023 years to inspiral due to gravitational wave energy loss.

That's quite a while; a leisurely hundred billion trillion years into the future.

Even an extreme planet-star configuration of a hot Jupiter orbiting a solar mass star at a mere 0.01 AU only gets us into the realm of a few trillion years inspiral due to gravitational wave radiation. 

So, the simple answer is that gravitational waves are being produced all around us, all the time. They're just really, really low energy compared to what happens with the universe's most compact and massive objects.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe