Interstellar Environments May Breed Complex Organic Molecules

If biologically important organic molecules like amino acids could form in interstellar space, the implications would be enormous. On the Earth we find plenty of amino acid species inside certain types of meteorites, so at a minimum these compounds can form during the assembly of a proto-stellar, proto-planetary system (at least this one) and end [...]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Hub of complex chemistry? Our galactic center (MSX/IPAC/NASA)

If biologically important organic molecules like amino acids could form in interstellar space, the implications would be enormous.

On the Earth we find plenty of amino acid species inside certain types of meteorites, so at a minimum these compounds can form during the assembly of a proto-stellar, proto-planetary system (at least this one) and end up intact on the surface of rocky planets. The implication is that there may be a 'starter-mix' of pre-biotic chemistry for young planets that comes from off-world, and which could play a role in the origins of life.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


However, it's not been clear whether this chemical heritage might extend further back in time and space, to the interstellar environment. Detecting complex molecules through astronomical spectroscopy is a tricky business, dealing in radio to infrared wavelengths, and with poorly understood spectral features that can all run together into a great big mess when peered at from afar. Although the majority of identified interstellar molecular species are organic, confirming the presence of chains and structural forms with more than a handful of carbon atoms is tough.

So a paper published in Science last week by Belloche and colleagues is particularly intriguing, because it claims the detection of what's called a 'branched alkyl' - the molecule iso-propyl cyanide (i-C3H7CN) - deep inside the most massive nebula region of star formation in our galaxy, Sagittarius B2, some 27,000 light years away in the galactic core. Using the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA), together with laboratory work on the spectral signature of this kind of molecule, the researchers identify both the branched and 'straight' version of propyl cyanide (shown left to right in the figure below).

Left: 'branched' iso-propyl cyanide, Right: 'straight-chain' normal-propyl cyanide.

 

 

 

 

What's very exciting is that this kind of branch structure is a key feature of side-chain molecules like amino acids, but until now only the straight-chain structure has been detected in similar interstellar molecules.

The likely reaction pathways to either molecular structure involve the environments present on the surface of ice-covered dust grains, but it seems that it may only be in the denser and more energy-rich environment of a place like Sagittarius B2 that conditions allow for branched isomers to form, and possibly dominate.

In other words, rich, star-forming regions may indeed have the right conditions to generate increasingly complex organic molecules (including amino acids) long before they end up mixed into the intense environment of a youthful planetary system. Unless all of that deep-space chemistry is undone - which seems unlikely - some of these molecules will be the very ones we find in meteorites and which must have painted the surface of a young Earth.

A next step for the astronomers is to start looking for an increased level of complexity; the butyl cyanides (n-C4H9CN), which boasts 3 branched isomers. The hunt is well and truly on for what could be our ancestral molecules.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe