Summer Astrobiology Roundup #1: How Mars Lost Its Swagger

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Young Mars, old Mars? (Original image: NASA)

 

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

 

 

 

 

 

Summer on our northern hemisphere, and human life slows a little, for some. Science carries on though, and there have been a number of fascinating discoveries and studies hitting the wires in recent weeks.

#1 How Mars lost its swagger...and atmosphere.

Sometimes it's good to reconfirm a suspicion. The Curiosity rover's Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) laboratory has been sniffing for the isotopic composition of the tenuous martian air. Earlier measurements of the proportions of isotopes like carbon-12 and carbon-13, oxygen 16, 17, and 18, or hydrogen and deuterium, have shown an enhancement in the heavier atomic nuclei compared to what would be expected from the primordial composition of the planet. It's a very particular signature, seen even in tiny 'bubbles' of atmosphere trapped in martian meteorites collected here on Earth. Now SAM's mass spectrometer and laser spectrometer have both confirmed a 'heavy'-skewed isotopic ratio in the atmosphere.

The most plausible physical cause is that over the past 4.6 billion years Mars has been shedding the lighter isotopes into space - leaving the heavier behind. Lighter atoms are more likely to escape from the top of the atmosphere - where particles stop bumping into each other so often, and effectively zoom around on ballistic trajectories. The less mass an atom or molecule has, the greater the chances it has of moving with escape velocity, and being boosted, or 'sputtered', off to space by solar wind protons or other radiation.

In fact, it looks like the majority of the loss had probably already taken place by 4 billion years ago, just 600 million years or so after Mars formed. Young Mars could have therefore had a thick atmosphere and a robust greenhouse effect to keep liquid water flowing on its surface - which would be consistent with a wealth of other evidence for a wet and warm history.

It's possible that some of this quick atmospheric loss was due to the lack of, or early demise of, a strong planetary magnetic field. There's evidence that this kind of magnetism used to exist, but it seems that it may have vanished when the planet was only some 500 million years old.

By contrast, here on Earth, our long-lived field helps stave off the erosive effects of solar particle radiation and lets us maintain our nice thick atmosphere. Why didn't Mars keep its magnetic field? We don't know, but there has been speculation that something switched off its internal planetary dynamo - possibly even an asteroid impact or two.

These new measurements also help set the stage for NASA's next Mars mission, the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution Mission (MAVEN), due to launch sometime in late November or early December 2013, and arrive at Mars in September 2014. MAVEN's task is to measure today's atmospheric loss on Mars. It will also dip to an altitude of just 80 miles to directly sample the composition of the upper atmosphere, and monitor the interaction of solar radiation with the martian environment.

The information MAVEN gathers will help us understand Mars today, but more importantly how Mars has evolved over the past several billion years. It will also represent a critical piece of 'ground truth' as we continue to study smaller and smaller exoplanets, many of which may be more like Mars than they are like the Earth.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe