Tiny, Tiny TRAPPIST-1

The 7-planet system of TRAPPIST-1 is remarkable in many ways, including its size

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


It's been a good week for exoplanetary science. The announcement of the discovery of 7 beautifully transiting planets around the dim, ultracool dwarf star TRAPPIST-1 a mere 39 light years from us, not only provides a terrific target for future space and ground-based telescopes, but also reinforces the fact that the cosmos is overflowing with planets that could be suitable for life.

I'm still digesting the details of what we already know about this system, including its seemingly fragile hold on orbital stability (likely saved by tidal dissipation effects). But one of the most intriguing characteristics is the sheer smallness of the system architecture. The estimated mass ratio between the total planetary mass of the inner 6 worlds and the star's mass is also about 0.02% - very similar (strikingly similar!) to the ratio between the total mass of the Galilean moons and Jupiter in our own system. Could this suggest a similar mechanism of formation? Some models for Jupiter's moons have shown that this ratio is consistent with a scenario of formation in a constantly evolving disk of material, where moons (or perhaps planets) migrate quickly inwards and only the last generations survive as the disk dissipates.

Take a look at the absolute scale of the TRAPPIST-1 system:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Solar system, Galilean moon system, and TRAPPIST-1 system to scale. Credit: ESO, O. Furtak

The TRAPPIST-1 planetary orbits are far closer in scale to the Jovian moon system than they are to those of the planets of our solar system - by a long shot. And of course TRAPPIST-1 itself, at about 8% the mass of our Sun is only a little larger in diameter than Jupiter.

TRAPPIST-1 is physically similar in size to Jupiter. Credit: ESO, O. Furtak

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe