Introducing #SciAmBlogs bloggers: Cassie Rodenberg

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Every week (or so) I post a quick Q&A with one of our bloggers on the network, so you can get to know them better. This week, I chat with Cassie Rodenberg from The White Noise blog.

Hello! Let’s start with first things first. What is the name of your blog and why did you choose that name – what does it mean?

My blog is called The White Noise and came after many a failed title brainchild. Defeated tries included “Monster” and “Vices.” Though I appreciate brevity, “The White Noise” won out quickly – it befitted the insidious nature of addiction, drugs and mental illness better than any other title, the way in which substance abuse exists as blurred sound below every cranny of life.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Where does the artwork for your banner come from, and what are you trying to convey with it?

The banner is designed simply, meant to express the drone and all-encompassing bind of substances, and their monochromatic effect on life. The talented photographer Justin Rose was kind enough to lend his design expertise.

Tell us more about yourself – where are you from, how did you get into science?

I admittedly have varied and wayward interests -- from economics to existentialist theory -- but all of them hold science, or the notion of “why and how,” an investigatory curiosity, at their center.

I’m from South Carolina and studied chemistry at the university. I credit my research days – studying the Amyloid-Beta precursor peptide to Alzheimer’s – for cementing my love and appreciation for the intricacies of scientific process. I cite my seventh grade phases-of-the-moon fascination and Charlestonian interest in pluff mud for the rest.

How did you get into science blogging and science writing? What were the early influences on you regarding your blogging style and topics?

I never thought of melding scientific and writing interests until college. Before then, and I suppose after, they were their own magnetic poles, aligning in tandem. Somewhere along the way, the expression and beauty of writing won over the exactitude of passive voice in lab reports. The chair of my department (chemistry), the wonderful Pat Owens, nearly insisted upon my blogging. I owe him much for that, and for encouraging the nugget of science writing in my mind.

What is your blog about? Who is your target audience, and why do you think people should read your blog?

My blog is about the greys of addiction and mental illness and all they entail -- batting at cultural notions and lacing what we’re predisposed and taught to think with chemistry. It’s too easy to ignore problematic, taboo pieces of society. The blog is for them: for addicts, those with mental illness, and their families and friends. The blog is for all of us, containing both the science and the emotional components of neurotransmitter quirks.

Anything else interesting about you, perhaps cool hobbies?

I like writing fiction, short stories mainly. Anything longer tends to turn into some sort of twisted horror fiction medley or another. There’s something beautiful in brevity.. though I do admit to recording many a free flowing scene into a voice recorder. Perhaps I’m building to something.

I also enjoy general adventuring, a good yoga session, and hearing stories.

Thank you!

==========

Previously in this series:

Michelle Clement

Janet Stemwedel

Charles Q. Choi

SciCurious

Jennifer Ouellette

Kate Clancy

Christina Agapakis

Melissa Lott

Jennifer Frazer

James Byrne

John Platt

Jason Goldman

S.E.Gould

Gozde Zorlu

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe