Introducing: Science Studio -- The year s best science multimedia

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


By Rose Eveleth

So it's 2013 everybody. There are all sorts of reasons to be excited about that. The world didn't end, the Emancipation Proclamation turned 150, and it's the first year since 1987 to be made up of four different numbers. We're* pretty excited for another reason - we're launching a big new project! It's called Science Studio, and it's brand spankin' new for 2013.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Regulars here at SciAm blogs probably know all about Open Lab. If you don't, it's a yearly roundup of the very best science blogging, nominated by you, judged by other bloggers and journalists and published in a very snazzy book. We love Open Lab, but we were a little sad because there's a lot of great science journalism out there that isn't found in typed words - it's made of sound or graphics or animations. So we got to thinking - what if we had an Open Lab for multimedia?

Well, we’re going to make that happen! Thanks to a generous grant from the National Association of Science Writers, we're well on our way to introducing Science Studio - the best online science multimedia. To get the rest of the way, we’ve just launched a Kickstarter. If we’re successful, you’ll have an amazing yearly collection of science to listen to on your run, drive or in the office.

We’re definitely hopeful it’ll succeed, so we’re opening for nominations now. This year we're focusing on audio pieces - all the best sciencey stuff that filled your ears this past year. Just like Open Lab, you can nominate your favorite pieces of audio - whether that's a show about the nature of time, to a podcast about superbugs. You can find more information at our website, thesciencestudio.org. The nomination form is there too (and below, just in case you're click averse).

Once all your nominations are in, we'll pick the very best and publish them online and as a podcast series. And next year we'll do more - not just audio, but multimedia, graphics, animations and the like. It's really just the beginning, and we couldn't be more excited. So, what are you waiting for, donate toward making it happen, and nominate something already!

*Who's we? Science Studio is run by Rose Eveleth, Ben Lillie and Bora Zivkovic and funded in part by the National Association of Science Writers.

Image credit: Maki Naro: sci-ence.org

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe