#SciAmBlogs Monday - Singing Snails, iceberg science, origin of mitochondria, nanosponges, and more.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Welcome back - I hope you had a great weekend.

Perhaps you have noticed we have a new co-blogger on The SA Incubator blog - Khalil Cassimally, the community manager of the Nature Education's Scitable network. Go say Hello.

- Ricki Lewis - The Making of a Mutant: A Fruit Fly Love Story


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

- Alexis Rudd - Singing Snails and Killer Whales: Parallels in Conservation

 

- Christie Rowe - Why Are There Field Geologists on a Drilling Vessel?

 

- Laura Jane Martin - The Co-Evolution of Insects, Plants and a Career

 

- Dana Hunter - The Real Heart of the Ocean

 

- David Bressan - The Science behind the Iceberg that sank the Titanic

 

- Maria Konnikova - The Innate Irresistibility of Film

 

- Jennifer Frazer - Mitochondria Are Related to Ocean Bacteria, But Not to the Ones We Thought

 

- Darren Naish - The Cadborosaurus Wars

 

- Krystal D'Costa - The Cost of Healthy Eating

 

- Melissa C. Lott - Nanosponge can absorb 100 times its weight in oil

 

- Bora Zivkovic - Whence Clocks?

 

- John R. Platt - 60 Rare Tuatara Reptiles Moved to Predator-Free New Zealand Island

 

- DNLee - Science Writing – Academically & Creatively

 

- Caitlin Contag - Catching up with Scientific Diving at USC Dornsife: Diving into the Aquarium of the Pacific

 

- Wayne Maddison - Spiders in Borneo: The spiders who wouldn’t be

 

- Joanne Manaster - The City Dark

 

- Anna Kuchment - Spring Science Festivals Mix Stars from Sky and Screen

 

- Bora Zivkovic - Introducing: Rachel Nuwer

 

- Bora Zivkovic - What is: ScienceOnlineVancouverandOpen Laboratory 2013 – submissions so farandScience events this month.

 

- Scicurious - Follow my eyes carefully…and vote for me!

 

- Gary Stix - Growing an Economy by Growing Weed

 

- Katherine Harmon - Fast Food Chains Dish Out More Salt per Serving in the U.S.

 

- Ferris Jabr - Spine Tuning: Finding Physical Evidence of How Practice Rewires the Brain

 

=======================

Conversations on our articles and blog posts often continue on our Facebook page - "Like" it and join in the discussion. You can also put our official Google Plus page in your circles.

You should follow the Blog Network on Twitter - the official account is @sciamblogs and the List of all the bloggers is @sciamblogs/sciambloggers.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe