September 11, 2012

#SciAmBlogs Tuesday - brain on internet, bad medical reporting, kids' brain scans, unrestricted wolf hunting, invisible QR codes, and more.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

- Kyle Hill - This is Your Brain on the Internet (Maybe)

- Christie Wilcox - Scientists play a large role in bad medical reporting

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

- Joris van Alphen - Mount Kinabalu: First Sight of the Summit

- Melissa Pandika - Surprise Valley: Down and Dirty in the Field

- Bora Zivkovic - ScienceOnline2012 – interview with David Ng

- Kalliopi Monoyios - SciArt of the Day: What’s Under the Hood?

- Ingrid Wickelgren - Scientists Scan Children’s Brains for Answers to Mental Illness

- John R. Platt - 23,000 People from 33 States Apply for Minnesota Wolf Hunting Permits; Unrestricted Hunting Starts Soon in Wyoming

- Jason G. Goldman - ScienceSeeker Editor’s Selections: Drinking for Science, Circadian Cycles, Facebook Spying

- Larry Greenemeier - Invisible Quick-Response Codes (the square ones) Could Thwart Counterfeiting

=======================

Conversations on our articles and blog posts often continue on our Facebook page - "Like" it and join in the discussion. You can also put our official Google Plus page in your circles.

You should follow the Blog Network on Twitter - the official account is @sciamblogs and the List of all the bloggers is @sciamblogs/sciambloggers.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American