June 27, 2012

#SciAmBlogs Wednesday - EvoPsych, elephant poachers, stigmatizing illness and addiction, Creative Commons, early human diet, and more.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

- Becky Crew - A cat that can never be tamed

- Scott Barry Kaufman - Is General Intelligence Compatible with Evolutionary Psychology?

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

- Sarah Hill - Lipstick, the Recession and Evolutionary Psychology

- Janet D. Stemwedel - Book review: Uncaged.

- John R. Platt - Massive Ivory Burn in Gabon Sends Message to Elephant Poachers

- Jennifer Ouellette - The Photon Has Two Faces

- Cassie Rodenberg - Art Asks, Should We Be More Sympathetic Towards Addicts?

- Ilana Yurkiewicz - Stigmatizing illness, stigmatizing others

- Christina Agapakis - PlantBricks

- Bora Zivkovic - -Introducing: Kate Yandell

- Rose Eveleth - Jumborizing: a brief history of the R/V Knorr

- Alex Wild - An Example of Why I Don’t Use Creative Commons Licenses

- DNLee - Wordless Wednesday: I’m a mammalogist

- Scicurious - Science: It's a PEOPLE thing

- Jason G. Goldman - ScienceSeeker Editor’s Selections: Dementia Praecox, MRI Explainer, and Snoozing Cephalopods

- Kate Wong - Ancient Tartar, Other Dental Clues Reveal Unexpected Diet of Early Human Relative

=======================

Conversations on our articles and blog posts often continue on our Facebook page - "Like" it and join in the discussion. You can also put our official Google Plus page in your circles.

You should follow the Blog Network on Twitter - the official account is @sciamblogs and the List of all the bloggers is @sciamblogs/sciambloggers.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American