Aging Mars rover suffers mental blackout

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Spirit rover, one of two twin explorers sent to Mars in 2004, suffered a bit of confusion over the weekend. The rover mysteriously did not respond to its driving commands last Sunday, although it acknowledged receiving them, and did not record its activities as it usually does. (Spirit and its partner, Opportunity, were originally tapped for three-month missions, but both continue to operate five years later.)

The memory glitch seems to be remedied, as Spirit properly recorded its activities Tuesday. And the rovers' project manager, John Callas of the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said in a statement that Spirit is now "reporting good health and [is] responsive to commands from the ground."

The rover team is unsure what could have caused the temporary snafu. One possibility is that cosmic rays, which pose a major obstacle to human exploration of the Red Planet, caused a computational error by delivering or producing unwanted electric charges. (Even on Earth, where the magnetic and atmospheric protection from such radiation is more robust, cosmic rays can mess with computers.) So what's the deal? Not sure, said Sharon Laubach, head of the rover's command team: "We don't have a good explanation yet for the way Spirit has been acting for the past few days." A senile moment, perhaps?

PHOTO FROM SPIRIT ROVER COURTESY OF NASA/JPL-CALTECH/CORNELL

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe