Alternative energy: The "wave" of the future?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The crux of the global warming crisis is how to reduce energy-related carbon dioxide emissions while keeping the lights on. A new In-Depth Report by ScientificAmerican.com takes a look at future technologies that might help.

One option is to build wind farms off shore, where stronger breezes can generate more energy than sites on or near shore and turbines won't block residents' ocean views. Leasing the outer continental shelf to offshore wind farms could generate nearly 1,000 gigawatts — slightly more than the country's current electrical capacity, according to a piece by Emily Waltz.

Another possibility is geothermal power, electricity generated by the Earth's own heat. Iceland, where nearly 90 percent of homes are heated with geothermal power and residents would pay an estimated five times more if they used traditional fossil fuels, is at the leading edge of the technology, exporting its expertise to Nevada, Germany and China.

"Wave power" generated by turbines in the tide and energy converters out at sea both produce kinetic energy that creates electricity. It's expensive and still proving itself, Larry Greenemeier writes, but it's working, generating nearly 50,000 kilowatt-hours of energy over a six-month period in New York's East River.

Hydrogen is touted as the green fuel of the future, but what's it like to take drive a hydro-powered car? Steven Ashley takes a spin in one of these vehicles, which exist but aren't yet widely available.

Raising the capital for these techologies could become a significant issue in the midst of the U.S. credit freeze and falling fuel prices, today's New York Times notes. The decline in fuel prices may be a disincentive for people to invest in alt-energy companies; shares of some have already declined, according to the Times.

One fun, counterintuitive concept is the solar-powered fridge, which uses reflective panels or heat sources other than a compressor to turn refrigerant from vapor to liquid. (Read more about how solar power works here.) Whaddya know: The hotter the sun, the better the solar fridge works. The snag? "Most neighborhood associations won't allow these things on your roof," complains the CEO of one startup testing solar-powered iceboxes. We can't imagine why not.

(Image of Pelamis wave energy converter courtesy of Pelamis Wave Power Ltd.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe