Am I a narcissist? Part II: Ask my staff

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A few weeks ago, I found out that my presence on Facebook can indicate just how narcissistic I am, thanks to a study in the October issue of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. But the results were far from definitive, and I am just too interested (in myself) to rest without a better answer.

So I was delighted to find out that there was another study on the matter in the same journal that took a different tack. In this study, psychologists tried to explain a paradox: "If the behaviors associated with narcissism are also associated with ineffective leadership, why then do narcissists so often rise to positions of leadership and power?"

This study, too, was clearly aimed at me. I lead a team of talented writers and editors, and my power is -- well, enough about my impressive credentials. In the study, researchers had subjects act out different scenarios: Picking a student union director, surviving a shipwreck, and allocating a corporate donation. They measured participants' narcissistic traits, and watched who emerged as leaders of given groups.

Surveys of the participants and outside observers measured leadership. I was intrigued by a footnote: One participant failed to complete all of the questions on "self-rated leadership." I mean, if you can't describe your own leadership, who's going to do it for you?

The results were not good news for me and other, um, potential narcissists: "The key practical implication of this study is that narcissism, a trait that is linked to a range of potential leadership problems, from risky decision making to white-collar crime actually predicts leader emergence. In other words, the same characteristic that facilitates an individual’s emergence as a leader can also make this person a potentially destructive leader."

Yikes.

There are solutions to narcissistic managers, though: Anthropologist and psychoanalyst Michael Maccoby recommends psychoanalysis, perhaps unsurprisingly. But he also suggests that having a sense of humor is adaptive.

I guess that means I should subject my staff to more of my brilliant jokes.

Image by sweetym via iStockphoto

 

Ivan Oransky is editor in chief of Spectrum and a distinguished writer in residence at New York University's Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute. He is a co-founder of Retraction Watch and a volunteer member of the board of directors of the PubPeer Foundation.

More by Ivan Oransky

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe