An Intel finalist finds a way to build better bridges

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


WASHINGTON, D.C.—It’s no secret that many of America’s bridges are in sad shape. One of the reasons is the corrosion of the steel rebar used to strengthen concrete structures. Deluged with de-icing salt and acidic compounds from industrial production, the steel weakens—potentially leading to disasters.

But changing the composition of the concrete can help reinforce the steel, according to Michael Loy, 17, one of 40 finalists in the 2009 Intel Science Talent Search here in Washington, D.C. this week for the final rounds of judging. (Read all of our coverage in this In-Depth Report.)

Loy, a student at Oregon Episcopal School, discovered that adding a certain mix of sodium borate to the concrete kept the steel from corroding under extreme conditions far better than a control mixture—to the point of being “still shiny, like it’s brand new,” he says. The steel also turned out to be 10 to 20 percent stronger in tests. He also had a  unique way of presenting some of the data—as a comic [see photo above].

Loy hit upon the idea for his project while working at a structural engineering company in Portland last summer. The company was retrofitting an old department store to become a hotel. Loy’s boss took him up on the 10th floor, then called him over and showed him one of the steel beams inside the old concrete. The metal was rusted, corroded and “generally not looking too good.” His first thought (after wondering how quickly he could get off the 10th floor) was that “if it’s happening here, it’s probably a problem elsewhere.”

After surveying the field and finding out that it was an extensive problem, he began tests at Portland State University and through a private testing service to determine ways to make the concrete stronger. He tested various solutions before finding out that sodium borate worked best. This is good news, because “it’s much cheaper than anything on the market – before I take my little cut,” he notes. He’s been offered a job at W. R. Grace, a Cambridge, Mass.–based firm that produces building materials, among other things, this summer, to continue his research and potentially bring the technology to market.

Photo of Michael Loy by one of his posters, at a pre-gala reception, by Laura Vanderkam/copyright Scientific American

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe