Anatomy of a Twitter hoax: What did we learn?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


What's the lesson behind the recent Internet hoax that had a blog reporting (Onion-style) that a nonexistent Harvard economist was blaming Twitter for the poor economy? That an Internet hoax is more than just a cheap stunt; it's a way to draw attention to the perpetrator of the hoax, not to mention coveted Web traffic to his site via forwarding links and favorable search engine placement.

Gaebler Ventures, the Chicago firm that created the bogus March 19 blog post (about alleged findings by faux Harvard Business School Professor Martin Schmeldon), has certainly proved its point. By the time Gaebler's chairman and CEO Ken Gaebler, confessed to the prank two days later, he said his original blog had been "retweeted over 600 times" and that his company's site was flooded with traffic.

The initial blog, complete with a fictitious chart showing the Dow Jones Industrial Average tumbling as the number of Twitter.com unique visitors rose, elicited 55 responses the first day it was posted, with comments ranging from admonitions of the fictitious Professor Schmeldon's assertions to confessions that Twitter had, in fact, affected one respondent's work productivity to the recognition by another that this must be "April Fool's joke, two weeks early."

Gaebler, not so ironically, turned to Twitter to promote his chicanery, enlisting the help of prolific tweeter Guy Kawasaki, whom Gaebler called the "Lou Ferrigno of Twitter." Kawasaki, a managing director of Palo Alto, Calif., firm Garage Technology Ventures, gave a keynote address at the Search Engines Strategies conference held in New York City this week. His somewhat obvious advice to fellow tweeters: "Automatically follow everyone who follows you on Twitter," monitor "what people are saying about you," and "be willing to take the heat if you use Twitter as a [marketing] tool," Businessknowhow.com reports.

Making sure he didn't miss a single PR opportunity, Gaebler, in his blog confessing the hoax, also offered advice for pulling off such a successful prank. Among his helpful hints: "After you get the buzz from the hoax, write an article like this about how to launch an effective Internet hoax. Then, shamelessly promote your article." Mission accomplished.

In the U.K., it seems that people can't learn his lessons early enough in life. The Telegraph reports that the U.K.'s Department for Children, Schools and Families is planning to give technology as much prominence as "literacy and numeracy." As a result, children will be required to be familiar with blogging, podcasts, Wikipedia and Twitter before moving on to secondary school.

Image ©iStockphoto.com/ Johanna Goodyear

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe