Apple's Mac turns 25

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Hard to believe it's been 25 years since Apple's slick TV spot, which aired during the third quarter of an otherwise forgettable Super Bowl between the Los Angeles Raiders and the Washington Redskins, ushered in the era of the Macintosh. The commercial depicts a drab future for humanity (in which, for some inexplicable reason, everyone is bald)a la George Orwell's 1984, featuring rows of gray-clad people complacently listening to "Big Brother" on a telescreen until a woman dressed in bright orange shorts rushes into the room, smashing the tedium with a well-placed throw of her Olympic-style hammer. (YouTube, of course, has the clip if you care to reminisce.)

This commercial, which ran two days before Apple's Macintosh hit the market, was a harbinger of the company's larger-than-life (and highly successful, for the most part) approach to selling technology. The first Macintosh was the original all-in-one personal computer, featuring a nine-inch (22.9-centimeter) monitor, floppy disk drive and eight-megahertz Motorola 68000 microprocessor sitting in a beige plastic tower. Its price tag: $2,500.

Apple trotted out the Mac as the successor to its $10,000 "Lisa" desktop computer, introduced in 1983. Lisa more processing power and held more memory than the Mac, but it was too pricey to compete with IBM's PC (introduced in 1981) and the various IBM-compatible clones of that technology made by Compaq, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, and others. The Mac was a paired down version of Lisa designed to challenge the IBM and its clones for domination of the burgeoning desktop computer market. (It lost.)

Apple's early miscues aside, the Mac was an innovative piece of equipment. It had a graphical user interface (GUI) and mouse that were both originally developed by Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) but made famous by Apple and its outspoken leader, Steve Jobs. The Mac also came with MacPaint graphics software and the MacWriter word processing program.

Despite their stylish design, rich color pallet and innovative features, Macs suffered in the late 1990s from the overwhelming success of Microsoft's Windows 95, a GUI that finally could compete with Apple's user interface and ran on PCs that cost hundreds of dollars less than the Mac. Apple's PC market share quickly shriveled to about 4 percent by 2002, author Merrill Chapman points out in his book "In Search of Stupidity," although the more recent success of its MacBook laptops and iMac PCs have lifted Apple's market share to about 8 percent of the U.S. market, MercuryNews.com reports.

Image courtesy of Grm wnr

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe