Arkansas tornado kills three

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Three people died, at least 24 were injured and 100 homes were damaged last night when a tornado tore through Mena, Ark., the Associated Press reports.

The twister touched down about 7:30 p.m. local time (8:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time) in the tiny town of 5,000 in the western part of the state near the Oklahoma border. As the sky turned green, "Me and the dog ran to the bathroom when we saw it on the TV," Rick Lanman, manager of the Mena Airport, told the AP. "It was here in less than a minute."

Tornados are rotating columns of air that reach from thunderstorms to the ground, with wind speeds up to 250 miles per hour, according to the National Weather Service. The funnel clouds cause on average 70 deaths and 1,500 injuries each year in the U.S.

VORTEX2, a program between government, academic and nonprofit scientists beginning next month, is designed to up scientists’ understanding of why the twisters form and improve their predictive capabilities.

Check out why green skies are associated with tornados and why twisters tend to strike in lightly populated areas.

Image of 1999 Oklahoma tornado/OAR/ERL/National Severe Storms Laboratory via Wikimedia Commons

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe