Australia, land of two-headed fish

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Scientists in Australia are looking at fish larvae there as if they have two heads—because they do.

Millions of larvae in the country’s Noosa River were found to have grown two noggins, and chemicals from a nearby macadamia nut farm may be to blame for the defect.

"Fish don't have two heads, they generally have one,” Acting Premier Paul Lucas tells today’s edition of The Australian newspaper. “Let's find out why that is the case.”

One of two commonly used farming chemicals—the insecticide endosulfan or the fungicide carbendazim—may have caused their disfiguration, according to the Courier Mail. The chemicals could have ended up in the river through spraying or runoff, Matt Landos, a lecturer in aquatic animal health at the University of Sydney, told the newspaper. The Noosa River is in the southeast section of the state of Queensland, which spans the northeast quadrant of Australia.

Landos told the Courier Mail that “it certainly looks like the fish have been exposed to something in the river," adding that he "wouldn't like to be having kids and living next to a place that uses these chemicals." Authorities have not found any toxins in the river but are still running tests, Lucas told The Australian.

The European Union is set to ban Carbendazim, according to France 24. U.S. registration of its parent compound, Benomyl, was cancelled in 2001 by manufacturer DuPont after farmers sued over crop damage. Benomyl was found to cause an abnormal number of chromosomes, reduced sperm counts and weight loss in lab rats.

Endosulfan is banned in the EU, New Zealand and parts of Asia and Africa, according to Australian media reports, and the Environmental Protection Agency is seeking comment on petitions to nix it in the U.S. The chemical has been linked to hyperactivity, nausea, dizziness, headache and seizures in humans, and kidney, liver and testes damage in animals, according to the federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

"These chemicals mess up cell development," Landos said. "There's no other plausible explanation for what's going on."

For more on chemical contamination and its potential effects on health, check out this piece on the world’s most polluted places.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Map of Australia/CIA via WikiMedia Commons

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe