Balking breezes: Will climate change decrease the effectiveness of wind power?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


New research shows that the very wind that many hope will turn alt-energy turbines may actually be dying. The reason, ironically: climate change, say the authors of a study that will be published this summer in Journal of Geophysical Research

Both average and peak U.S. gusts have been on the decline for at least 30 years, particularly in the East and Midwest, reports the Associated Press, and fewer days—than in the past—have any breeze at all, according to lead study author, Sara Pryor, a professor of atmospheric science at Indiana University.

Winds are still blowing across the West at a good clip, but according to the readings (taken from wind-measuring stations), the Midwest has seen a 10 percent decrease over the past 10 years. "The stations bordering the Great Lakes do seem to have experienced the greatest changes," Pryor told the AP, explaining that with more water and less ice on the lakes (thanks to warming), winds move more slowly across the surface.

On a global scale, a cut in wind power makes sense with climate models, noted co-author Eugene Takle, a professor of atmospheric science at Iowa State University. As poles warm up, temperature—and likewise pressure—differences between the equator and poles will even out, which means less wind, the authors explained.

Although the research is based on years of data measurement, the authors admit that more rigorous study is needed to understand how climate change will impact winds—and wind power, a source that currently supplies about 1.5 percent of the globe's juice. Pryor also noted that it's possible changing landscapes around measurement equipment—from new buildings to growing trees—could skew the results over time.

Some climate scientists and wind energy proponents disagree with the findings, noting that models have so far shown no impact on wind speeds. But the director of Pennsylvania State University's Earth System Science Center, Michael Mann, told the AP that the research "demonstrates, rather conclusively in my mind, that average and peak wind speeds have decreased over the U.S. in recent decades."

Image courtesy of rptnorris via Flickr

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe