Bizarre Planet Found to Orbit Backward

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the search for planets beyond our solar system, the UK's Wide Area Search for Planets (WASP) has stumbled upon a bizarre-o world that is orbiting its star in reverse. 

"I have to say this is one of the strangest planets we know about," Sara Seager, an astrophysicist from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told SPACE.com.

After stars spin up, they usually bring in nearby debris, which picks up the same directional orbit. "With everything [in the star system] swirling around the same way and the star spinning the same way, you have to do quite a lot to it to make it go in the opposite direction," Coel Hellier, of the UK's Keele University, told the BBC.

Indeed, the newly discovered exoplanet likely took a large close call with another even larger object to swing the planet (named WASP-17b) into a retrograde orbit. "If you have a near-collision, then you'll have a large gravitational slingshot from that interaction," Hellier said.

It's the first known planet to have such an unexpected orbit although some of the other planets' moons in our solar system fly a backward track around their planets.

Astronomers discovered WASP-17b's retrograde orbit by watching the star it orbits. "If you look at how the spectrum of the star changes when the planet transits across it," Hellier said, "you can work out which way the planet is traveling."

He and a team of researchers also calculated the gaseous planet's size (by checking the extent of the star's movement as the planet passed) as twice as big as Jupiter but with a mass of about half of that planet.  The low density could be explained by the near miss with another large object, or by the planet's long elliptical orbit, which brings it close to its weighty star.

"I think it's extremely exciting," Seager, who wasn't involved in the find, told SPACE.com. "It's fascinating that we can study orbits of planets so far away." This gaseous giant is about 1,000 light years away. Seager was glad to see proof of this phenomenon. "There's always theory, but there's nothing like an observation to really prove it," she said.

Artistic rendering of another exoplanet orbiting close to its star courtesy of ESA/NASA/M. Kornmerrer/STScl

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe