Body clock linked to weight gain

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That midnight trip to the fridge might be doing double damage. Most people know by now that it's poor dietary form to eat right before bed, but the body's natural circadian rhythm and related rest cycles might also have more to do with weight gain than previously thought, according to a study published online today in the journal Obesity.

With more than a third of U.S. adults tipping the scales to obese levels, rooting out the many causes of our collective weight gain has proved to be a difficult undertaking.

"How or why a person gains weight is very complicated, but it clearly is not just calories in and calories out," Fred Turek, a co-author of the study and professor of neurobiology and physiology at Northwestern University's Weinberg College of Arts in Evanston, Ill., said in a prepared statement.

Researchers in his lab at Northwestern's Center for Sleep and Circadian Biology were interested in the observed weight gain in late-night shift workers. "Their schedules force them to eat at times that conflict with their natural body rhythms" as cued by daylight and other signals, Deanna Arble, lead study author and doctoral researcher in Turek's lab, said in a prepared statement.

To examine off-schedule eating, the research team divided lab mice into two groups: active-period eaters and rest-period eaters. The mice that were given unlimited access to high-fat food only during their normal rest periods increased in heft by 48 percent, whereas those given unlimited access to fatty food during their normal activity periods put on about 20 percent of bulk over their baseline. The next step will be to pinpoint the mechanisms behind this finding, the researchers note.

The link between the circadian rhythm and weight is not a new one. In 2007, researchers located Nocturnin, a gene that works in both the circadian clock and in controlling weight gain in fatty diets. And two studies published earlier this year in Science illuminated the relationship further, detailing the role of coenzyme NAD+ in the circadian cycle and the connections between circadian protein CLOCK and the metabolic gene SIRT1.

While many of the mechanisms remain mysterious, simply shifting snack time could help some trim down. "Better timing of meals, which would require a change in behavior, could be a critical element in slowing the ever-increasing incidence of obesity," Turek said.

Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons/Pharos

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe