Bush: Gray wolves aren't endangered any more

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Most gray wolves will no longer be protected following a ruling yesterday by the Bush administration.

The Interior Department yesterday announced that dwindling wolf populations in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Idaho and Montana had been sufficiently replenished to strip them of their endangered status. The feds, however, said that gray wolves in Wyoming aren’t sufficiently protected and will remain on the Endangered Species Act.

Wolves have recovered in the Great Lakes and the northern Rocky Mountains because of the hard work, cooperation and flexibility shown by States, tribes, conservation groups, federal agencies and citizens of both regions,” Deputy Secretary of the Interior Lynn Scarlett said in a statement. “We can all be proud of our various roles in saving this icon of the American wilderness.”

This is the Bush administration's latest attempt to de-list the wolf; three previous tries were reversed after courts ruled in favor of environmentalists who had sued to keep the animals protected.

Conservationists are threatening to sue again if President-elect Barack Obama doesn’t reverse the decision, one of a series of controversial, last-minute reg changes that President Bush has pushed through during his final days in office. The move is set to take effect a month after it's published next week in the Federal Register.

A transition team spokesman, Nick Shapiro, told the Los Angeles Times that Obama "will review all 11th-hour regulations and will address them once he is president."

The Center for Biological Diversity, a conservation group based in Tucson, Ariz., is one of the groups vowing to sue. “This rule ignores the wise protections of the Endangered Species Act, will result in the deaths of over a thousand wolves, and will unravel the natural balance these wolves have maintained,” Michael Robinson, an advocate at the center, said in a statement.

The gray wolf was given protected status when the Endangered Species Act took effect in 1974 after logging and hunting in the early 20th century nearly destroyed the species. Its status since has been an ongoing tug-of-war between ranchers who want to kill them because they threaten their livestock (Idaho Gov. Butch Otter once said he'd be the first in line to buy a wolf-hunting tag), and conservationists, who say states don't have management plans in place to protect renewed populations. The Fish & Wildlife Service requires that states in wolf-recovery zones have such plans before the animals can be de-listed.

The wolves' replenishment has had some welcome environmental effects, Scientific American reported in 2004. Among them: their return to Yellowstone National Park helped control the population of elk there, which had eaten trees that beavers relied on for food.

We've got more on the long battle over the wolves' protected status and a rundown of de-listed endangered species.

Image by Gary Kramer/USFWS

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe