California sues Bush administration to protect endangered species

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


California this week sued the feds to block a new Bush administration rule from taking effect that would relax portions of the Endangered Species Act.

The rule, finalized December 16, permits the Commerce and Interior departments to sign off on new projects that may threaten wildlife and their habitat without input from independent scientists that is now required. The new measure, set to take effect hours before President-elect Barack Obama is sworn into office Jan. 20, also allows regulators to ignore the effects on wildlife of potential greenhouse-gas emissions from those projects.

"The Bush administration is seeking to gut the Endangered Species Act on its way out the door," California Attorney General Jerry Brown said in a statement after the state filed the lawsuit Monday in Northern California Federal District Court in Oakland.

Conservation groups, including the Natural Resources Defense Council, National Wildlife Federation and the Center for Biological Diversity, have also sued, but it's unusual for a state to make the same move. An aide said earlier this month that Obama "will review all [Bush admnistration] eleventh-hour regulations and will address them once he is president."

Ken Alex, California's senior assistant attorney general, told the Los Angeles Times that the new rules would drive up the cost of protecting California's own species by removing the federal protections.

"These regulations are illegal," Alex told the newspaper.

Tina Kreisher, a spokesperson for the Department of the Interior, refused to comment in on an ongoing legal case. Spokespersons for the Commerce Department and National Marine Fisheries Service, which are also named in the suit, did not return calls for comment.

The rule is one of a series of so-called midnight regulations that the Bush administration issued in its waning days. Among the other controversial ones: a "right of conscience" clause that bars health care facilities from receiving federal funds if they fail to honor the rights of employees to refuse to provide services they oppose, such as abortion and emergency contraception.

Flag of the Republic of California via Wikimedia Commons

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe