Can fresh air help companies cool computers more cheaply?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


High-tech giants like Google and Microsoft are getting socked with high electric bills to cool ever-expanding data centers (computers don't like heat or humidity). In an attempt to lower costs, some of them are using fresh air to help maintain optimum temps–and now there's a way to gauge how much money and energy they can save by taking this tack. The Green Grid, a Portland, Ore.,–based consortium of 208 businesses (including Google and Microsoft) with megadata centers, today launched a free tool on its Web site designed to help U.S. and Canadian companies figure out how Mother Nature can help them keep their cool—and how much dough and energy they can save by tapping her reserves.

Potential savings depend on a number of factors, including where a data center is located, the local cost per kilowatt hour of power, how much energy a facility uses and the specific temperatures and humidity levels required, according to Mark Monroe, a member of the Green Grid's board of directors and Sun Microsystems's director of sustainable computing.

The Green Grid's software calculates the number of hours per year that a data center could use ambient temperature for cooling with the help of historical atmospheric data from 2,186 U.S. and Canadian weather stations collected between 1999 and 2008.

Based on this free cooling calculator, a company with a one megawatt (1,000 kilowatts) data center in San Jose, Calif. (zip code 95101), for example, that pays about 13 cents per kilowatt hour, could save $66,000 per year using cool outside air rather than air conditioning. The data center could save another $160,000 per year if it liquid cooled certain areas of the facility using a network of pipes filled with water drawn from cooling towers when the outdoor temperature is lower than the temperature indoors (instead of running a chiller to keep the water cool).

"Until recently, energy has been cheap," Monroe says, "so building designers had gotten complacent in terms of energy management in a facility's cooling systems."

A report in August 2007 issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimated that data centers consume 1.5 percent of all energy used in the U.S., and that this consumption is doubling every five years.

Image © Green Grid

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe