Can a simple checklist prevent surgical errors?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A new study has found that hospitals could cut surgery complications by about 30 percent and resulting deaths by 40 percent if doctors and nurses follow a checklist of safety rules before, during and after performing surgery.

The checklist, issued by the World Health Organization last year in response to soaring reports of hospital errors, lists 19 steps that surgical teams should follow, starting with making sure that the right patient is on the operating table, the site of incision has been located, and that the proper procedure is about to be performed. "In this era of highly intense and sophisticated technology, sometimes a very simple technology, which only takes a few minutes, can have a very positive impact," says Richard Reznick, head of surgery at the University of Toronto in Canada and co-author of the study published today in theNew England Journal of Medicine.

He and fellow researchers collected data on surgery complications and deaths of 7,688 surgical patients at eight hospitals in Seattle, Toronto, London, Auckland, Ifakara, (Tanzania), Manila (Philippines), New Delhi (India), and Amman (Jordan).  These hospitals did not initially require use of the WHO safety checklist but adopted it during the course of the study. The goal of the research was to find out how implementing the checklist impacted the number of surgery complications and deaths. Of the 3,733 patients who had surgeries before the checklists went into use, 411 (11 percent) suffered complications (such as pneumonia and skin infections) and 56 (1.5 percent) of them died; of the 3,955 patients who were operated on after the hospitals adopted the WHO guide, 277 (7 percent) suffered complications and 32 (0.8 percent) died.

This study "is an attempt to make this an international standard," says Reznick, noting that the majority of hospitals around the world do not use the guidelines. But he cautions that this is just one way to prevent unnecessary complications and deaths. He says hospitals should also, among other things, mandate infection control programs to prevent post-surgery infections.

Some 234 million major surgeries are performed around the world annually, roughly one operation for every 25 people, according to WHO. The international aid agency estimates that approximately half of all surgical complications are preventable.

"Attention to patient safety will pay dividends, in terms of lessening complications and saving lives," Reznick says. "[The idea is to] try to enact things globally."

Image credit ©iStockphoto.com/Jacob Wackerhausen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe