Can nuclear waste cleanup concepts be tapped to help remove arsenic from drinking water?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Arsenic removal from drinking water is a priority for local water authorities, given that long-term exposure  has been linked to a host of serious health problems, including cancer, nervous system damage and atherosclerosis (inflammation) in the arteries leading to the brain. That's why Water Technology Group, Inc., in Harvard, Mass., last week licensed arsenic-trapping technology from the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho National Laboratory (INL).

Water Technology Group–an affiliate of Northeast Water Solutions, Inc. in Warwick, R.I.–wants to use INL's Nano-Composite Arsenic Sorbent (N-CAS), a beadlike resin containing high concentrations of microscopic metal oxides, to improve its ability to catch arsenic in contaminated water. The company plans to make the beads available to Northeast Water as well as other water treatment companies doing arsenic remediation.

Demand for N-CAS has been high since the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2006 reduced the maximum concentration of arsenic it permits in drinking water from 50 parts per billion (ppb) to 10 ppb. The decision affected 4,000 U.S. municipalities and nearly 14 million U.S. homeowners whose water resources now exceed the new limits. (INL says 70 million people worldwide are exposed to dangerous arsenic concentrations.)

INL began developing N-CAS in 2005 in anticipation of the stiffer regs, says INL research engineer and project leader Troy Tranter. INL Researchers, experts in the separation and removal of fissionable material used as nuclear fuel, engineered a nanoparticle that would react specifically with arsenic. The resin's chemistry would need to be altered for it to detect and trap other elements.

N-CAS is only one of many technologies being tested for its ability to treat drinking water. New Mexico's Sandia National Laboratories, which also serves the Energy Department, since 2000 has offered local utilities, including the Public Water Service Utilities Board in El Paso, Texas, its Specific Anion Nanoengineered Sorbents (SANS) treatment for arsenic-heavy water.

Images courtesy of Idaho National Laboratory

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe