Canadian bacon: Pigs in Canada sick with swine flu

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Last Friday, we reported on Egypt's recent attempt to curb transmission of the human H1N1 epidemic by butchering all 300,000 of its pigs. Experts we interviewed said there was no sound rationale for such a move, because pigs had never been infected with the new virus, which has sickened at least 1085 people in 21 countries – until now.

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) recently announced that a herd of pigs in Alberta might have caught the new virus from a Canadian who had recently spent time in Mexico, ground zero for the current epidemic. Fortunately, both man and pigs have recovered or are in the process getting better, but the incident raises a new question: do pigs now pose a threat to humans?

Rodney Baker, a senior clinician at the Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine in Ames, is not too worried about this particular herd of sick pigs, because it's small (only about 2,000 animals he estimates, some 200 of which have reportedly fallen ill) and relatively isolated (about six miles, or 10 kilometers from the next farm). He tells ScientificAmerican.com that even if the virus were to take root in the broader pig population, odds are it would become more adapted to pigs and less adapted to humans. The likelihood of the virus genetically morphing into a new, more deadly strain capable of jumping from pigs and back into humans is extremely low.

But the virus doesn't need to change to be a threat, says Israel's former chief veterinary officer Arnon Shimshony. Pigs can pass the original virus right back to humans, particularly if they are coughing and sneezing, and thereby shedding virus particles, as media reports suggest, Shimshony tells us. The Canadian government is wise to quarantine these animals, he adds, but notes that he does not have enough information about the case to offer advice on slaughtering them. 

The good news, Baker points out, is that the pigs do not appear to have passed the virus back to humans, as there are no reports of other farm workers getting sick. He suspects the new virus will continue popping up on pig farms, because farm workers in the U.S., many of whom travel back-and-forth from Mexico, will continue to be exposed to the virus. And for that reason, he says, we need a vaccine for the pigs as well as the people.

See our In-Depth Report for more on the swine flu outbreak.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe