Celiac disease is on the rise

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Frozen blood samples collected more than 50 years ago reveal that celiac disease, an intolerance to the wheat protein gluten, was less than a quarter as common then as it is today.
 
"Celiac disease is unusual, but it's no longer rare," said Joseph Murray, a gastroenterologist at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and lead author of a study published this month in the journal Gastroenterology, in a statement. "Something has changed in our environment to make it much more common.”

What that difference is researchers still don’t understand. What they do know is that nearly 1 in 100 people tested recently in Minnesota were positive for the antibody to gluten—the hallmark of celiac disease. That’s more than a four-fold increase compared with people whose blood was sampled at Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming between 1948 and 1954.

Individuals were matched "across time" by both birth year and age. The latter comparison resulted in close to a five-fold difference in prevalence, suggesting young people today are at an even higher risk.

This reaction to gluten, a group of proteins found in grains like wheat and barley, can damage the small intestine and prevent the body from properly absorbing vitamins and minerals. Once diagnosed, however, adjustments to the diet make celiac very manageable.

Because most people with the disease remain undiagnosed, Murray says it’s time to start “looking for celiac disease in the general population, more like we do in testing for cholesterol or blood pressure." Those with “silent” celiac disease—all subjects in the early cohort, since diagnosis wasn't common until the 1990s—were nearly four times more likely to die during the study’s 45 years of follow-up than people celiac-free.

“The increasing prevalence, combined with the mortality impact, suggests celiac disease could be a significant public health issue,” said Murray.

Photo by Whatsername? via Flickr.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe