Climate kerfuffle: Did Sen. Barbara Boxer really direct a "racial slant" at African-American Harry Alford?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


At yesterday’s climate hearings, Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer of California looked down at the black man testifying about the impact of climate legislation on business and asked: “Colored boy, what are you doing with this sophisticated report?”

Or at least that’s the way Harry Alford, CEO of the National Black Chamber of Commerce, recounted it in a phone interview with Breitbart.tv’s B-Cast.  “It was condescending,” he said, “like being in Mississippi in 1945.... She owes America an apology.”  

Who the heck is Harry Alford and what actually happened in the Environment and Public Works Committee?  


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Alford’s organization—which does not disclose its membership but claims to have 190 chapters that “reach” 95,000 black-owned businesses—had commissioned a report in May predicting that the climate bill would cost 2.5 million jobs and result in a $350 billion decline in the gross domestic product.  

As Grist’s Kate Sheppard points out, his group has received $350,000 from ExxonMobil since 2003, including $75,000 last year, or about 10 percent of its revenue. The organization’s Web site and tax filings list only Alford and his wife Kay DeBow as officers. Alford has previously said that the Kyoto Protocol was based on “flawed science” and has accused environmentalists of using “scare tactics.”

Yesterday, he also attacked the climate bill for its potential impact on the economy, particularly minority owned businesses. He said these impacts worry him and his members “because the black community suffers mightily when the economy goes south.”  

Boxer, however, apparently had the gall to point out during the hearing that the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People approved a resolution this week supporting climate change policy.  

Boxer's reference to the NAACP's stance did not sit well with Alford. “All that’s condescending,” he replied. “It’s racial.... I take offense to that.”  He went on complaining that this had nothing to do with the NAACP, and he didn’t like having to “contend with some other black group.”  

He had his own proposal for dealing with climate change: expanding the use of oil, gas, and coal—and apparently, engaging in racial theatrics.

Watch the whole exchange here.

Image of Harry Alford courtesy U.S. Senate

 

Brendan Borrell is a freelance journalist based in Brooklyn, New York. He writes for Bloomberg Businessweek, Nature, Outside, Scientific American, and many other publications, and is the co-author (with ecologist Manuel Molles) of the textbook Environment: Science, Issues, Solutions. He traveled to Brazil with the support of the Mongabay Special Reporting Initiative. Follow him on Twitter @bborrell.

More by Brendan Borrell

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe