Color scheme: Red focuses attention, blue sets your mind free

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Do you always use your lucky blue pen on an exam? Maybe you should switch to red.

University of British Columbia (UBC) researchers tested 600 people on detail-oriented tasks (such as proofreading) and creative tasks (such as brainstorming). They did better on the detail-driven tests when the background on their computers was red, and better on the creative tests when the background was blue, according to results published in today's Science Express.
 
Even if most of us associate red with danger and blue with tranquility, the link between color and cognitive performance isn’t as obvious as it sounds, says study co-author Julia Zhu, an assistant professor of marketing at UBC. "People are very unaware of the different effects of color: They always think blue will help them do better," Zhu tells ScientificAmerican.com. "If the task is requiring detailed attention, go with red, but if it's asking you to think outside the box, blue will help."

The findings complement those of University of Rochester psychology professor Andrew Elliot, who published research in 2007 showing that people who saw red before an IQ test performed worse, possibly because of the negative association of red with teachers' markups of their work. The idea is that — at least in achievement situations — red reminds us of mistakes, and we want to avoid them. Having red in our environment, then, may inhibit our creative juices, because we're so focused on avoiding errors, says Markus Maier, an assistant professor of social and health psychology at Stony Brook University in New York.

"The attention can be good for detection tasks and bad for more complex-solving tasks," Maier says. "If you have to solve a very complicated problem, that focus on attention hurts you, because you should look broader but you cannot."

Context matters, though. Last year, Elliot showed that men were more attracted to women wearing red than to those clad in other colors. You might say, then, that in the romance realm, red is a performance enhancer.
Image © iStockphoto/bluestocking

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe