Daschle withdraws as HHS secretary nominee

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Tom Daschle withdrew his nomination as health secretary today following growing criticism of his failure to pay more than $120,000 in taxes, according to published reports. At least two newspapers, The New York Times today and The Wall Street Journal yesterday, ran editorials calling for the former South Dakota senator and minority leader to step aside.

Pres. Obama named Daschle as his pick to head up the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on December 11. He was a close advisor to Obama throughout the presidential campaign, and advocated for more expansive health coverage, especially for the estimated 47 million Americans without insurance.

Daschle, a Democrat who served 18 years in the Senate, also fought hard for former Pres. Clinton's health reform plan, which would have created universal coverage.

As HHS secretary, Daschle would have overseen a number of federal agencies, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Obama said he accepted Daschle's withdrawal "with sadness and regret," according to the Associated Press.

Image of Tom Daschle by U.S. Senate via Wikimedia Commons

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe