Death on Mount Everest: The perils of the descent

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


As difficult as it is to scale Mount Everest, coming back down from the world’s tallest peak is far more deadly, a new study shows.

Some 192 of the 212 deaths on the Himalayan mountain that occurred between 1921 and 2006 were above base camp, according to research in this week’s online edition of the British Medical Journal. Among climbers who died after scaling higher than 8,000 meters (26, 246 feet) above sea level, 56 percent succumbed on their descent from Everest’s 8,850-meter (29,000-foot) summit, and another 17 percent died after turning back. Just 15 percent died on the way up or before leaving their final camp.

Most of the deaths were among climbers – not sherpas who are native to the high altitude and have previously been found to have broader arteries and capillaries to deliver oxygen to their blood. While the sherpas who died did so more often at low altitudes — from falls or avalanches — for the climbers, the thin mountain air near the top proved fatal. They died mostly because the lack of oxygen caused blood vessels in their brains to leak fluid into the surrounding tissue, causing a fatal swelling called cerebral edema.

Study co-author Paul Firth, an anesthesiologist at Massachusetts General Hospital, said in a press release that he expected to find that most of the deaths would have been caused by avalanches and falling ice at low altitudes, and for higher-altitude deaths to be caused by pulmonary edema, or fluid in the lungs.

But R. Douglas Fields, chief of nervous system development and plasticity at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), tells ScientificAmerican.com that the findings aren’t surprising. "That’s actually a common rule in climbing that more people die coming down than going up," says Fields, who was not involved in the study. "You're spent getting to the top. You get tired, you're exhausted."

Cerebral edema, a feature of altitude sickness, is a known cause of death among oxygen-starved climbers and is curable only by descending, Fields adds. The fatal cases may have occurred higher on the mountain than lethal pulmonary edema, he notes, "because it is impossible to keep climbing if you can’t breathe. People with mental impairment might be able to keep climbing longer."

The overall death rate among the more than 28,000 people who tried to scale the mountain was 1.3 percent, or 212 people. The scientists – from Harvard, the University of Toronto and three British hospitals – couldn’t determine where on the mountain 13 percent of the deaths occurred because there weren't witnesses.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image of Mount Everest by topgold via Flickr

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe