Death on Mount Everest: The perils of the descent

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


As difficult as it is to scale Mount Everest, coming back down from the world’s tallest peak is far more deadly, a new study shows.

Some 192 of the 212 deaths on the Himalayan mountain that occurred between 1921 and 2006 were above base camp, according to research in this week’s online edition of the British Medical Journal. Among climbers who died after scaling higher than 8,000 meters (26, 246 feet) above sea level, 56 percent succumbed on their descent from Everest’s 8,850-meter (29,000-foot) summit, and another 17 percent died after turning back. Just 15 percent died on the way up or before leaving their final camp.

Most of the deaths were among climbers – not sherpas who are native to the high altitude and have previously been found to have broader arteries and capillaries to deliver oxygen to their blood. While the sherpas who died did so more often at low altitudes — from falls or avalanches — for the climbers, the thin mountain air near the top proved fatal. They died mostly because the lack of oxygen caused blood vessels in their brains to leak fluid into the surrounding tissue, causing a fatal swelling called cerebral edema.

Study co-author Paul Firth, an anesthesiologist at Massachusetts General Hospital, said in a press release that he expected to find that most of the deaths would have been caused by avalanches and falling ice at low altitudes, and for higher-altitude deaths to be caused by pulmonary edema, or fluid in the lungs.

But R. Douglas Fields, chief of nervous system development and plasticity at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), tells ScientificAmerican.com that the findings aren’t surprising. "That’s actually a common rule in climbing that more people die coming down than going up," says Fields, who was not involved in the study. "You're spent getting to the top. You get tired, you're exhausted."

Cerebral edema, a feature of altitude sickness, is a known cause of death among oxygen-starved climbers and is curable only by descending, Fields adds. The fatal cases may have occurred higher on the mountain than lethal pulmonary edema, he notes, "because it is impossible to keep climbing if you can’t breathe. People with mental impairment might be able to keep climbing longer."

The overall death rate among the more than 28,000 people who tried to scale the mountain was 1.3 percent, or 212 people. The scientists – from Harvard, the University of Toronto and three British hospitals – couldn’t determine where on the mountain 13 percent of the deaths occurred because there weren't witnesses.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image of Mount Everest by topgold via Flickr

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe