Death toll approaching 100 in Italy earthquake

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


More than 90 people are feared dead and tens of thousands are homeless after a magnitude 6.3 earthquake rocked the mountainous Abruzzo region of Italy today.

The temblor struck at 3:32 a.m. local time (9:32 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time Sunday) 60 miles (95 kilometers) northeast of Rome, according to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). The New York Times is reporting that it killed 92 people and left the homes of as many as 50,000 others in ruins.

“Some towns in the area have been virtually destroyed in their entirety,” said Gianfranco Fini, speaker of the lower house of Parliament, according to the newspaper.

The quake occurred in the Apennines, a mountain belt that runs from the Gulf of Taranto in southern Italy to the Po basin in the northern part of the country. It was caused by northeastward movement of a microplate under the Adriatic Sea, which pulls apart the rocks that make up the Apennine chain, according to Roger Musson, a seismologist at the British Geological Survey.

Twelve years ago, 11 people were killed, more than 100 injured and 80,000 homes were destroyed when a magnitude 6.0 quake hit 53 miles (85 kilometers) north of today’s temblor, according to the USGS. That quake was part of a series of eight tremblors (all measuring greater than 5.0 on the Richter scale) called the Umbria–Marche seismic sequence that struck between September and November 1997. Another quake in the region in 1915 some 40 kilometers south of the one today killed about 30,000 people, making it one of the deadliest in Europe in the 20th century, Musson said in a statement.

For more on earthquakes—and what causes them—read our In-Depth Report.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe